Особисті немайнові та виключні майнові права на об’єкти інтелектуальної власності у структурі неправомірної вигоди
Вантажиться...
Дата
2015
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України. - 2015. - № 3 (11). - С. 90-101.
Анотація
У статті розглядається питання щодо змісту та сутності неправомірної вигоди, що полягає у нематеріальних активах, які обіцяють, пропонують, надають або
одержують без законних на те підстав; коли такими
нематеріальними активами виступають особисті
немайнові права інтелектуальної власності; обґрунтовується необхідність їх віднесення до ознак злочинів,
передбачених статтями 160, 354, 3641, 3652, 368, 3683,
3684, 369, 3692, 370 КК України.
The scientific article is devoted to the analysis of the grounds of criminal liability for accepting the offer, promise, receive or proposition or provision of improper advantage and substantial component of criminal and legal category of “improper advantage” that acts as generic definition both for a number of crimes in the area of official activities and professional activities, related to the provision of public services (Section XVII of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), as well as for crimes under Sections V and XV of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 160 and 354 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Among other features, the notion of improper advantage under the general rule is characterized in the law as an indicator on the list of values (benefits), which are the types of such benefits, namely: a) cash or other assets; b) advantages; c) benefits; d) services; d) intangible assets. Herewith it is noted that intangible asset – is the ownership on the results of intellectual activity, including industrial property, as well as other similar rights admitted as an object of ownership (intellectual property). According to the above stated it follows that intangible assets as an object of improper advantage may be offered, promised or provided to a person only by the owner (subject) of intellectual property, and therefore accepting the offer, promise or receipt of improper advantage can be carried out only by a person who is not such a subject. It should be considered that relations of intellectual property rights are not always real tangible assets, but non-intangible items of the material world, which are embodied as a rule in material objects, and the main part of intellectual property rights is the material social relations, the object of which is some non-property formations (composition, performance, invention, etc.), which are reflected in the things of the material world. So the right to admit a person as a creator (author, artist, inventor, etc.) in the form of personal non-property right of intellectual property, although does not have economic substance, but it is admitted by the civil legislation of Ukraine as non-property right, certainly has a material nature and in the case of offer, promise or its transfer (provision) or receipt without legitimate justification (when a creator of the corresponding object of intellectual property right is another person than indicated) is the type of improper advantage and can form a corpus delicti of the corresponding crime. It is concluded that the intangible assets as a subject of improper advantage should include both exclusive property and personal non-property rights on the objects of intellectual property because of their ability to obtain material benefits (advantages) not only from property rights, but from the right of an author, artist, inventor and other persons in recognition of them as creators of corresponding result of intellectual activity (copyright). Here - with it is noted that despite the new wording of the notes to the Articles 354 and 364-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, services, benefits and privileges of immaterial (moral) character can not be admitted as a subject of improper advantage.
В статье рассматриваются вопросы содержания неправомерной выгоды, заключающейся в нематериальных активах, которые обещают, предлагают, предоставляют или получают без законных на то основа - ний; в случае, когда такими нематериальными активами выступают личные неимущественные права интеллектуальной собственности; обосновывается необходимость отнесения их к признакам преступлений, предусмотренных статьями 160, 354, 3641, 3652, 368, 3683, 3684, 369, 3692, 370 УК Украины.
The scientific article is devoted to the analysis of the grounds of criminal liability for accepting the offer, promise, receive or proposition or provision of improper advantage and substantial component of criminal and legal category of “improper advantage” that acts as generic definition both for a number of crimes in the area of official activities and professional activities, related to the provision of public services (Section XVII of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), as well as for crimes under Sections V and XV of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Articles 160 and 354 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Among other features, the notion of improper advantage under the general rule is characterized in the law as an indicator on the list of values (benefits), which are the types of such benefits, namely: a) cash or other assets; b) advantages; c) benefits; d) services; d) intangible assets. Herewith it is noted that intangible asset – is the ownership on the results of intellectual activity, including industrial property, as well as other similar rights admitted as an object of ownership (intellectual property). According to the above stated it follows that intangible assets as an object of improper advantage may be offered, promised or provided to a person only by the owner (subject) of intellectual property, and therefore accepting the offer, promise or receipt of improper advantage can be carried out only by a person who is not such a subject. It should be considered that relations of intellectual property rights are not always real tangible assets, but non-intangible items of the material world, which are embodied as a rule in material objects, and the main part of intellectual property rights is the material social relations, the object of which is some non-property formations (composition, performance, invention, etc.), which are reflected in the things of the material world. So the right to admit a person as a creator (author, artist, inventor, etc.) in the form of personal non-property right of intellectual property, although does not have economic substance, but it is admitted by the civil legislation of Ukraine as non-property right, certainly has a material nature and in the case of offer, promise or its transfer (provision) or receipt without legitimate justification (when a creator of the corresponding object of intellectual property right is another person than indicated) is the type of improper advantage and can form a corpus delicti of the corresponding crime. It is concluded that the intangible assets as a subject of improper advantage should include both exclusive property and personal non-property rights on the objects of intellectual property because of their ability to obtain material benefits (advantages) not only from property rights, but from the right of an author, artist, inventor and other persons in recognition of them as creators of corresponding result of intellectual activity (copyright). Here - with it is noted that despite the new wording of the notes to the Articles 354 and 364-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, services, benefits and privileges of immaterial (moral) character can not be admitted as a subject of improper advantage.
В статье рассматриваются вопросы содержания неправомерной выгоды, заключающейся в нематериальных активах, которые обещают, предлагают, предоставляют или получают без законных на то основа - ний; в случае, когда такими нематериальными активами выступают личные неимущественные права интеллектуальной собственности; обосновывается необходимость отнесения их к признакам преступлений, предусмотренных статьями 160, 354, 3641, 3652, 368, 3683, 3684, 369, 3692, 370 УК Украины.
Опис
Харченко, В. Б. Особисті немайнові та виключні майнові права на об’єкти інтелектуальної власності у структурі неправомірної вигоди // Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України. - 2015. - № 3 (11). - С. 90-101.
Харченко В. Б. "Особисті немайнові та виключні майнові права на об’єкти інтелектуальної власності у структурі неправомірної вигоди." Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України 3 (2015): 90-101.
Харченко В. Б. "Особисті немайнові та виключні майнові права на об’єкти інтелектуальної власності у структурі неправомірної вигоди." Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України 3 (2015): 90-101.
Ключові слова
Кримінальне право. Criminal Law. Уголовное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, неправомірна вигода, нематеріальні активи, право на об’єкти інтелектуальної власності, особисті немайнові права на результати творчої діяльності, improper advantage, intangible assets, right on the objects of intellectual property, personal non-property rights on the results of creative activity, неправомерная выгода, нематериальные активы, право на объекты интеллектуальной собственности, личные неимущественные права на результаты творческой деятельности