Невиконання судових рішень в механізмі криміногенної детермінації
Вантажиться...
Дата
2015
Автори
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України. - 2015. - № 1 (9). - С. 280-301.
Анотація
Стаття присвячена дослідженню ролі невиконання судових рішень в механізму детермінації індивідуальної
злочинної поведінки, а також злочинності. Виділено та
охарактеризовано механізм кримінальної активності
злочинця-жертви та рецидиву злочинів з урахуванням
предикатного невиконання судового рішення. Зроблено
висновок про те, що невиконання судових рішень є потужним інформаційним фактором відтворення загальної злочинності.
Judgments’ non-execution is one of the most dangerous types of crimes that infringe on the relations of justice. Undermining its functional ability, the spread of these criminal practices levels the significance of the right itself, eliminates the authority of the state power. The mass of these forms of criminal activity generates signal system anyhow aimed at the destruction of the state machinery, legal system in the whole. An important condition for successful counteraction of judgments’ nonexecution is knowledge about the role of these crimes within the mechanism of criminal determination. It is possible to organize large scale criminal and preventive influence by using them. A lot of scholars paid attention to theoretical studies of counteracting crimes against justice. Their criminological characteristics are worked out; the general rules of their prevention are formed. However, there is still a significant gap in complex modern scientific research devoted to the analysis of criminal deterministic value of judgments’ non-execution. The objective of the article is to determine the role of judgments’ nonexecution, as a form of mass criminal practices in the mechanism of criminal determination. The study of judgments’ non-execution in the mechanism of criminal determination is made in two areas: the role of this crime in the mechanism of individual criminal behavior and in the mechanism of crime determination. Within the first direction the author has isolated and characterized: a) mechanism of criminal behavior of an offender-victim (or the mechanism of victim criminalization). Previous judgments’ non-execution serves here as a factor of frustration, prompting a person, in whose interests the decision has not been executed, to satisfy own interests (both those that are the object of a judgment, and others – that arise due to meet related needs and the desire for a revenge) in a criminal manner; b) the mechanism of recidivism criminal behavior (or the mechanism of further criminalization), which is inherent to criminal behavior of a person guilty in the previous judgment’s non-execution. Special attention is paid on the fact that judgment’s non-execution is a significant information factor in reproducing general crime. Being spread in the society, judgments’ non-execution forms signal system somehow functionally aimed at the destruction of the state machinery, legal system in the whole. Thus, acquiring external (subject and situational) dominant form of determination of criminal activity at the mass level, the spread of the facts of judgments’ nonexecution can serve an essential condition for a certain part of crime. The perspective direction for further research remains theoretical development and specification of some components of the mechanism of crime determination in general, the place of judgments’ non-execution in it.
Статья посвящена исследованию роли неисполнения судебных решений в механизме детерминации индивидуального преступного поведения, а также преступности. Выделены и охарактеризованы механизмы криминальной активности преступника-жертвы и рецидива преступлений с учётом предикатного неисполнения судебного решения. Сделан вывод о том, что неисполнение судебных решений является мощным информационным фактором воспроизводства общей преступности.
Judgments’ non-execution is one of the most dangerous types of crimes that infringe on the relations of justice. Undermining its functional ability, the spread of these criminal practices levels the significance of the right itself, eliminates the authority of the state power. The mass of these forms of criminal activity generates signal system anyhow aimed at the destruction of the state machinery, legal system in the whole. An important condition for successful counteraction of judgments’ nonexecution is knowledge about the role of these crimes within the mechanism of criminal determination. It is possible to organize large scale criminal and preventive influence by using them. A lot of scholars paid attention to theoretical studies of counteracting crimes against justice. Their criminological characteristics are worked out; the general rules of their prevention are formed. However, there is still a significant gap in complex modern scientific research devoted to the analysis of criminal deterministic value of judgments’ non-execution. The objective of the article is to determine the role of judgments’ nonexecution, as a form of mass criminal practices in the mechanism of criminal determination. The study of judgments’ non-execution in the mechanism of criminal determination is made in two areas: the role of this crime in the mechanism of individual criminal behavior and in the mechanism of crime determination. Within the first direction the author has isolated and characterized: a) mechanism of criminal behavior of an offender-victim (or the mechanism of victim criminalization). Previous judgments’ non-execution serves here as a factor of frustration, prompting a person, in whose interests the decision has not been executed, to satisfy own interests (both those that are the object of a judgment, and others – that arise due to meet related needs and the desire for a revenge) in a criminal manner; b) the mechanism of recidivism criminal behavior (or the mechanism of further criminalization), which is inherent to criminal behavior of a person guilty in the previous judgment’s non-execution. Special attention is paid on the fact that judgment’s non-execution is a significant information factor in reproducing general crime. Being spread in the society, judgments’ non-execution forms signal system somehow functionally aimed at the destruction of the state machinery, legal system in the whole. Thus, acquiring external (subject and situational) dominant form of determination of criminal activity at the mass level, the spread of the facts of judgments’ nonexecution can serve an essential condition for a certain part of crime. The perspective direction for further research remains theoretical development and specification of some components of the mechanism of crime determination in general, the place of judgments’ non-execution in it.
Статья посвящена исследованию роли неисполнения судебных решений в механизме детерминации индивидуального преступного поведения, а также преступности. Выделены и охарактеризованы механизмы криминальной активности преступника-жертвы и рецидива преступлений с учётом предикатного неисполнения судебного решения. Сделан вывод о том, что неисполнение судебных решений является мощным информационным фактором воспроизводства общей преступности.
Опис
Лагода, К. О. Невиконання судових рішень в механізмі криміногенної детермінації / К. О. Лагода // Вісник Кримінологічної асоціації України. - 2015. - № 1 (9). - С. 280-301.
Ключові слова
Кримінологія. Criminology. Криминология, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, невиконання судового рішення, криміногенна детермінація, механізм детермінації, індивідуальна злочинна поведінка, злочинність, judgment’s non-execution, criminal determination, determination mechanism, individual criminal behavior, crime, неисполнение судебного решения, криминогенная детерминация, механизм детерминации, индивидуальное преступное поведение, преступность