Статтю присвячено аналізу сучасних підходів до встановлення ролі інтуїції як важливого пізнавального інструменту творчих процесів. Розглянуто визначення поняття «інтуїція». Особливу увагу приділено абстрактно-логічному і просторово-образному типам мислення, проблемі співвідношення дискурсивного (логічного) та інтуїтивного у процесі кримінологічного пізнання.
The current level of the development of criminological scientific knowledge allows
to clarify and, in some cases, to review some traditional assumption and assessment
of the relevant instruments. Obviously, understanding of intuition, which was made
before, did not satisfy the theory and practice, as well as the approaches to the problem
solving by the means and techniques of traditional conceptual theory. Meanwhile, a
comprehensive study of the problem, finding of internal differentiation of intuitive
knowledge and demonstration of the implemented potential of intuition will make
it possible to study the essence of the problem more fully and adequately. According
to its nature, the process of cognition in criminology is subjective and presumptive.
However, objective patterns of the development of really existing circumstances, events
and processes their typical changes under the influence of various factors are laid in
the basis. Information on these circumstances and facts are incomplete; especially it
concerns the data on crime rate, where there is always an element of the unknown. However, intuition – is a direct, immediate choice of the truth. It significantly differs
from the indirect, sensible cognition. It is innate cognitive ability, which depends on
the volume of practical experience. Knowledge itself does not generate intuition, but
assists the disclosure of its content. Thus, scientific intuition – is quality special kind of
cognitive activity, coiled logic of thinking. On its basis the parts of the research process
are carried in the minds more or less unconsciously, but the result of thought – the truth
that requires further discursive proof is very clearly understood. The priority action field
of scientific intuition – is the scientific inquiry. Rational cognition by a criminologist of
hidden with the time and space from him phenomena and events related to crime is
built as follows: the reference object (typical data and characteristics) – the scheme
of actions with the standard (the program of criminological research) – extrapolation
of certain data on the ideal to a broader subject area or the entire reality (creative
adjustment of a program and the development of an algorithm of actions). The fact that
this knowledge is not transmitted to the brain by some copies of objects, but acts as a
subjective image tells in favor of the authenticity of the cognition obtained in this way. It
is an imaginary meeting with cognitive, immediate stay in the original and merge with
it is a guarantee of reliability of the obtained information.
Статья посвящена анализу современных подходов к определению роли
интуиции как важного познавательного инструмента творческих процессов.
Рассмотрено определение понятия «интуиция». Особое внимание уделено абстрактно-логическому и пространственно-образному типам мышления, проблеме соотношения дискурсивного (логического) и интуитивного в процессе криминологического познания.
