Аналізуються проблеми функцій норм кримінального права
через зіставлення їх змісту з правовою природою методу
кримінально-правового регулювання. Робиться висновок, що
функції норм кримінального права не можливо вивчати без
урахування завдань галузі права і методу правового регулювання. Констатується, що норми кримінального права, що
встановлюють покарання за вчинення кримінального правопорушення, виконують дві головні функції – запобіжну та
відновлювальну.
Particularly acute today is the issue of the social purpose
of criminal law, which occupies the most important place in the system of Ukrainian
law. This is due to its hierarchy in this system and to the performed functions, as if
the regulation of other branches of law stops, then the criminal and legal regulation
begins. However, today there are a number of unresolved aporia, through which the
science of criminal law can not exist without the ideology of the Soviet legal tradition.
Approaches to determining the definition of the function and their types, attributing
criminal law with the ideological, educational and other functions, can not get rid of
the Soviet past. The problems of determining the function are under
the scope of such scholars in the field of forensic science as: D. I. Anisimov, M. I. Baitin,
V. K. Duiunov, I. E. Zvecharovskyi, M. I. Kovalov, S. V. Maksymov, V. V. Maltsev, R. I. Mykhieiev, A. V. Naumov, P. P. Osypov, A. S. Otsiatsia, M. I. Panov, A. A. Piontkovskyi, V. S. Prokhorov,
B. T. Razhildiiev, V. H. Smyrnov, V. Ya. Tatsii, P. A. Fefelov, V. D. Fylymonov, V. V. Shablystyi
and others. However, the overall degree of discussions has not been decreased, but
otherwise, the problems of functions of the criminal law norms continue to cause great
interest among scholars in the field of forensic science, expanding the range of discussed
issues and increasing the breadth of the discussion field. The objective of this study is to outline the approach to study the functions of
the criminal law norms on the foundation of the tasks of the law branch and the method
of criminal and legal regulation. The author has analyzed the problems of criminal law functions
through the comparison of their content with the legal nature of the method of criminal
and legal regulation. The problem is in the compliance with the requirements of formal
logic in determining the definition of regulatory (regulating) function of criminal
law, which is applied together with the definition of criminal and legal regulation.
Therefore, considering the mechanism of criminal and legal regulation while allocating
the regulatory function is meaningless, as there is unwanted contamination of these
criminal and legal phenomena. However, the functions of law should be regarded
as independent main areas of criminal and legal regulation. That’s why the name “regulatory” for the function makes it impossible to understand the content of
the definition of legal regulation, but only gets a researcher to a dead-end of the
cognition of criminal and legal matter.
The specificity, nature and character of performing the functions of criminal and
legal regulation are defined by the method. The latter enables the accomplishment
of the tasks of criminal law, ensuring the appropriate level of the implementation of
the rights and execution of the duties by the subjects of criminal law. The action of
criminal and legal method is associated with such special means of influence, when
the main legal consequence is imposing prohibitions and obligations, but not giving
a certain right to the subjects. In other words, the legal prohibiting orientation and
and influence – are the most significant characteristics of criminal law and its method.
The duty of the subjects of criminal law not to commit acts prescribed by the norm of
the Special Part of the Law on criminal liability is the result of the legal prohibition
by the will of the state; this duty derives from the constitutional one – to observe
the regulations of the laws and the Constitution of Ukraine.
Thus, the specificity of the method of criminal and legal regulation allows the
statement about the diversity of the concepts of the function and method in the context
of criminal law and in any case, they can not be identified, because it would lead to
an incorrect understanding of the mechanism of criminal and legal regulation. Thus: 1. The norms of criminal law establishing the punishment
for a criminal offense, perform two main functions – preventive and restorative.
2. Allocation of other functions has an additional nature, but the main one we have
to admit the accomplishment of the tasks of criminal law and the nature of criminal
and legal regulation while clarifying them. Otherwise, this approach may lead to the
allocation of the functions that are not inherent to the norms of criminal law. 3. Further
scientific developments of the theory of functions of criminal law norms are possible
through a broad scientific discussion of the outlined by us problems. However, in our
opinion, we should consider civilized approach, rather than to “pull” out of the Soviet past
by the ideological communist regime, providing the criminal law with the functions that
were not performed and could not be implemented either under the current conditions
or under the conditions of the country’s development in the ХХ century.
Анализируются проблемы функций норм уголовного права через сопоставление их содержания с правовой природой метода уголовно-правового регулирования. Делается вывод, что функции норм уголовного права невозможно изучать без учёта задач отрасли права и метода правового регулирования.
Констатируется, что нормы уголовного права, устанавливающие наказание за совершение уголовного правонарушения, выполняют две главные функции –
предупредительную и восстановительную.
