Про теоретичну стадію перевірки концептів "алгоритми кримінально-правового регулювання" і "модель кримінально-правового регулювання"
Вантажиться...
Дата
2023
Автори
DOI
http://forumprava.pp.ua/files/093-100-2023-4-FP-Lantinov_12.pdf
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Форум права. - 2023. - № 4 (77). - С. 93-100
Анотація
Проаналізовано концепти "алгоритми кримінально-правового регулювання" та "концептуальна система (модель) кримінально-правового регулювання" та з'ясовано їх пізнавальні властивості. Надано перевірку гіпотези щодо продуктивності використання вказаних концептів через можливість створення уявлень придатних до входження у теоретичну систему вчення про кримінально-правову політику протидії злочинності та через можливість постановки завдань для емпіричних досліджень.
In the previous publication, it was clarified that the term "mechanism of criminal legal regulation" and its fluctuations ("mechanism of implementation of criminal responsibility", "mechanism of implementation of criminal legislation"), which is usual for criminal law discourse, is not correct, because it does not correspond to the characteristics of "mechanisms "as a type of real systems, and therefore is not suitable for developing productive and agreed concepts, hypotheses, theories and compiling from them a theoretical system of knowledge about the criminal law policy of crime prevention. Instead, the following concepts were proposed: "algorithms of criminal legal regulation", "conceptual system (model) of criminal legal regulation", "function of the ecosystem of legal regulation". The purpose of this publication is to test the hypothesis regarding the productivity of the use of the specified concepts through the possibility of creating ideas suitable for inclusion in the theoretical system of learning about the criminal law policy of crime prevention and through the possibility of setting tasks for empirical research. Methods. The methodological foundation of this stage of research is based on the concepts of the nature and features of scientific knowledge developed in the debate between T. Kuhn and K.R. Pop-per, as well as independently by the notion of activity and management as communication, the conception of humans, human communities, and their activities as systems, ideas inherent in dialectical materialism (causal relationships, necessity, sufficiency, conditions, interrelation, correlation, convergence, false connection, consistency, contradiction, probability, synthesis, etc.). The cognitive model utilizes the opposition of "subject-object" and, at the same time, acknowledges that the outcome of cognitive acts is the formulation not of a conclusion belonging to "objective truth" but rather to "discursive knowledge," particularly rules (explanations) of a certain degree of completeness and correctness that can be utilized by agents as a narrative, reference, or data, according to their goals and abilities with varying degrees of success. Inductive, deductive, and transductive reasoning is conducted according to the rules of formal logic. Definitions of phenomena can be proposed in the form of cognitive patterns (typical examples, models), cognitive concepts (through belonging to a set), cognitive clusters (combination of a pattern or concept with their justification, including examples, axioms, theories, results of statistical or other empirical research, etc.). Results. It has been established that the explanatory power of the studied concepts is sufficient to describe the phenomena constituting the subject of criminal law policy on crime prevention and to develop productive explanations for them. Conclusions. Based on the formulation of the specified concepts and the theoretical testing of their suitability, definitions have been formulated "Algorithm of criminal law regulation" is a term that is appropriate to use to denote a rule by which subjects of criminal law regulation perceive signals about phenomena (an event or other sign of the occurrence of a condition) and choose an activity option, in particular, the implementation or non-implementation of criminal acts legal regulation or application of other measures; "Model of criminal law regulation" should be understood as a conceptual system (organizational rule), i.e., a fairly ordered set of ideas, explanations and other rules, according to which criminal law or other measures are implemented, practiced (implemented) and withdrawn from practice, which are used to manage law enforcement, judicial activity or other forms of social management based on the operation of strict coercion.
Проанализированы концепты "алгоритмы уголовно-правового регулирования" и "концептуальная система (модель) уголовно-правового регулирования" и выяснены их познавательные свойства. Дана проверка гипотезы относительно производительности использования указанных концептов через возможность создания представлений пригодных к вхождению в теоретическую систему учения об уголовно-правовой политике противодействия преступности и через возможность постановки задач для эмпирических исследований.
In the previous publication, it was clarified that the term "mechanism of criminal legal regulation" and its fluctuations ("mechanism of implementation of criminal responsibility", "mechanism of implementation of criminal legislation"), which is usual for criminal law discourse, is not correct, because it does not correspond to the characteristics of "mechanisms "as a type of real systems, and therefore is not suitable for developing productive and agreed concepts, hypotheses, theories and compiling from them a theoretical system of knowledge about the criminal law policy of crime prevention. Instead, the following concepts were proposed: "algorithms of criminal legal regulation", "conceptual system (model) of criminal legal regulation", "function of the ecosystem of legal regulation". The purpose of this publication is to test the hypothesis regarding the productivity of the use of the specified concepts through the possibility of creating ideas suitable for inclusion in the theoretical system of learning about the criminal law policy of crime prevention and through the possibility of setting tasks for empirical research. Methods. The methodological foundation of this stage of research is based on the concepts of the nature and features of scientific knowledge developed in the debate between T. Kuhn and K.R. Pop-per, as well as independently by the notion of activity and management as communication, the conception of humans, human communities, and their activities as systems, ideas inherent in dialectical materialism (causal relationships, necessity, sufficiency, conditions, interrelation, correlation, convergence, false connection, consistency, contradiction, probability, synthesis, etc.). The cognitive model utilizes the opposition of "subject-object" and, at the same time, acknowledges that the outcome of cognitive acts is the formulation not of a conclusion belonging to "objective truth" but rather to "discursive knowledge," particularly rules (explanations) of a certain degree of completeness and correctness that can be utilized by agents as a narrative, reference, or data, according to their goals and abilities with varying degrees of success. Inductive, deductive, and transductive reasoning is conducted according to the rules of formal logic. Definitions of phenomena can be proposed in the form of cognitive patterns (typical examples, models), cognitive concepts (through belonging to a set), cognitive clusters (combination of a pattern or concept with their justification, including examples, axioms, theories, results of statistical or other empirical research, etc.). Results. It has been established that the explanatory power of the studied concepts is sufficient to describe the phenomena constituting the subject of criminal law policy on crime prevention and to develop productive explanations for them. Conclusions. Based on the formulation of the specified concepts and the theoretical testing of their suitability, definitions have been formulated "Algorithm of criminal law regulation" is a term that is appropriate to use to denote a rule by which subjects of criminal law regulation perceive signals about phenomena (an event or other sign of the occurrence of a condition) and choose an activity option, in particular, the implementation or non-implementation of criminal acts legal regulation or application of other measures; "Model of criminal law regulation" should be understood as a conceptual system (organizational rule), i.e., a fairly ordered set of ideas, explanations and other rules, according to which criminal law or other measures are implemented, practiced (implemented) and withdrawn from practice, which are used to manage law enforcement, judicial activity or other forms of social management based on the operation of strict coercion.
Проанализированы концепты "алгоритмы уголовно-правового регулирования" и "концептуальная система (модель) уголовно-правового регулирования" и выяснены их познавательные свойства. Дана проверка гипотезы относительно производительности использования указанных концептов через возможность создания представлений пригодных к вхождению в теоретическую систему учения об уголовно-правовой политике противодействия преступности и через возможность постановки задач для эмпирических исследований.
Опис
Ключові слова
кримінально-правова політика протидії злочинності, модель кримінально-правового регулювання, алгоритми кримінально-правового регулювання, механізм кримінально-правового регулювання, criminal law policy of countering crime, model of criminal law regulation, algorithms of criminal law regulation, mechanism of criminal law regulation, уголовно-правовая политика противодействия преступности, модель уголовно-правового регулирования, алгоритмы уголовно-правового регулирования, механизм уголовно-правового регулирования
Бібліографічний опис
Лантінов, Я. О. Про теоретичну стадію перевірки концептів "алгоритми кримінально-правового регулювання" і "модель кримінально-правового регулювання" [Електронний ресурс] / Я. О. Лантінов // Форум права. - 2023. - № 4 (77). - С. 93-100. - Режим доступу: http://forumprava.pp.ua/files/093-100-2023-4-FP-Lantinov_12.pdf.
Лантінов, Я. О. (2023). Про теоретичну стадію перевірки концептів "Алгоритми кримінально правового регулювання" і "Модель кримінально правового регулювання". Форум Права, 77(4), 93–100. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10156293/
Lantinov, Y. A. (2023). Pro teoretychnu stadiyu perevirky kontseptiv "Alhorytmy kryminalno pravovoho rehulyuvannya" i "Model kryminalno pravovoho rehulyuvannya" [About the Theoretical Stage of Testing the Concepts "Criminal Legal Regulation Algorithms" and "Criminal Legal Regulation Model"]. Forum Prava, 77(4), 93–100. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10156293.
Лантінов, Я. О. (2023). Про теоретичну стадію перевірки концептів "Алгоритми кримінально правового регулювання" і "Модель кримінально правового регулювання". Форум Права, 77(4), 93–100. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10156293/
Lantinov, Y. A. (2023). Pro teoretychnu stadiyu perevirky kontseptiv "Alhorytmy kryminalno pravovoho rehulyuvannya" i "Model kryminalno pravovoho rehulyuvannya" [About the Theoretical Stage of Testing the Concepts "Criminal Legal Regulation Algorithms" and "Criminal Legal Regulation Model"]. Forum Prava, 77(4), 93–100. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10156293.