Публікація: Ефективність цивільного судочинства та процесуальна активність суду
Дата
2015
Назва видання
ISSN
Назва тому
Видання
Юридичний науковий електронний журнал. - 2015. - № 5. - С. 57-60
Анотація
У статті досліджені напрями підвищення ефективності цивільного судочинства з позиції процесуальної активності суду. Зроблений висновок, відповідно до якого розширення повноважень суду із залучення учасників процесу та формування доказового матеріалу за своєю ініціативою буде сприяти ефективності судового захисту.
The article explores ways to improve the efficiency of civil proceedings with the position of the procedural activity of the court. The author analyzed European directions of the optimization powers of the courts. It has been established that they are associated with the development of a mixed-type proceedings. It is characterized by the balance of activity of the parties and the court, the increased role of the court to manage the process, the formation of evidence material. The properties of effective justice must lead to the compliance of the procedural law, compliance with procedural deadlines, the right to establish the true facts and accurate application of the law to them. Thus the efficiency of judicial activity can be measured not only by the level of compliance by civil procedural form. At a resolution of a civil dispute for the purpose of performing the task of a fair trial the court must determine the range of legal facts, which is associated with a controversial relationship. Judicial knowledge of the case should lead to a full and proper knowledge of the facts that are relevant to the case, it will ensure the adoption of decisions rightly. In the context of the adversarial process is not always achievable. The main course in the development of contemporary civil procedure concluded bilateral convergence adversarial and investigative proceedings. Convergence is characterized by the fact that the development process understood as the optimal correspondence of activity of the parties and the court. The court in preparation for the case and the court during the trial played an active role in maintenance of operative implementation of the legal proceedings in accordance with the rights of the parties. According to the author empowering that attraction by the court participants in the process and the formation of evidence will contribute to the effectiveness of judicial protection.
В статье исследованы направления повышения эффективности гражданского судопроизводства с позиции процессуальной активности суда. Сделан вывод, согласно которому расширение полномочий суда по привлечению участников процесса и формированию доказательного материала по своей инициативе будет способствовать эффективности судебной защиты.
The article explores ways to improve the efficiency of civil proceedings with the position of the procedural activity of the court. The author analyzed European directions of the optimization powers of the courts. It has been established that they are associated with the development of a mixed-type proceedings. It is characterized by the balance of activity of the parties and the court, the increased role of the court to manage the process, the formation of evidence material. The properties of effective justice must lead to the compliance of the procedural law, compliance with procedural deadlines, the right to establish the true facts and accurate application of the law to them. Thus the efficiency of judicial activity can be measured not only by the level of compliance by civil procedural form. At a resolution of a civil dispute for the purpose of performing the task of a fair trial the court must determine the range of legal facts, which is associated with a controversial relationship. Judicial knowledge of the case should lead to a full and proper knowledge of the facts that are relevant to the case, it will ensure the adoption of decisions rightly. In the context of the adversarial process is not always achievable. The main course in the development of contemporary civil procedure concluded bilateral convergence adversarial and investigative proceedings. Convergence is characterized by the fact that the development process understood as the optimal correspondence of activity of the parties and the court. The court in preparation for the case and the court during the trial played an active role in maintenance of operative implementation of the legal proceedings in accordance with the rights of the parties. According to the author empowering that attraction by the court participants in the process and the formation of evidence will contribute to the effectiveness of judicial protection.
В статье исследованы направления повышения эффективности гражданского судопроизводства с позиции процессуальной активности суда. Сделан вывод, согласно которому расширение полномочий суда по привлечению участников процесса и формированию доказательного материала по своей инициативе будет способствовать эффективности судебной защиты.
Опис
Ключові слова
процесуальна активність суду, змагальність, ефективність судового захисту, procedural activity of the court, adversary proceeding, effective judicial protection, процессуальная активность суда, состязательность, эффективность судебной защиты
Бібліографічний опис
Бортнік, О. Г. Ефективність цивільного судочинства та процесуальна активність суду [Електронний ресурс] / Бортнік О. Г. // Юридичний науковий електронний журнал. - 2015. - № 5. - С. 57-60. - Режим доступу: http://www.lsej.org.ua/5_2015/15.pdf.