Розподіл обов’язків з доказування в справах про відшкодування моральної (немайнової) шкоди
Вантажиться...
Дата
2023
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Аналітично-порівняльне правознавство. - 2023. - № 1. - С. 171-179
Анотація
Розглянуто існуючі доктринальні підходи до визначення особливостей розподілу обов’язків по доказуванню в справах про відшкодування моральної (немайнової) шкоди в цивільному судочинстві України. Підкреслено відсутність законодавчого закріплення презумпції наявності моральної (немайнової) шкоди законодавством.
Факт заподіяння моральної шкоди повинен довести позивач. Позивач має також обов’язково обґрунтовувати свою вимогу про наявність моральної шкоди відповідними доказами. Визнано законодавче закріплення наявності презумпції моральної (немайнової) шкоди в окремих категоріях справ.
The authors of the article study the problem of distributing responsibilities on proving in cases of reimbursement for moral (non-pecuniary) damage. At the same time, it has been noted that each party is currently obliged to prove those circumstances, to which it refers to as the basis of its requirements and objections. Thus, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine of 2004 introduced a new concept of adversarial proceedings into civil procedure, where the parties are obliged to play an active role in judicial proving (Art. 12 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine). The authors of the paper have concluded that both the parties and all persons who are authorized to collect and present evidence, take part in their verification and evaluation in accordance with the procedure established by law are subjects in all civil cases, as well as in cases on reimbursement of moral (non -pecuniary) damage. Accordingly, it is also applied to the court, which should be actively involved in the proving process. The authors of the research have concluded that the process of proving provides the distribution of responsibilities between the subjects, when their will coincides with respect to the subject matter of the dispute. Another thing when such a will has different content. It is the specific feature of the adversarial principle, which is the basis for the distribution of responsibilities on proving, when the parties defend their interests presenting the necessary evidence in the case, pursuing the purpose – to obtain a positive judgment for themselves. It has been emphasized as a result of the research that legal presumptions play a significant role in the distribution of responsibilities on proving, that is, the assumptions enshrined in the law on the existence of certain facts about other facts related to them. The presumption releases the party, who benefits of its establishment, from proving the fact. Cases for the reimbursement of moral (non -pecuniary) damage are no exception to this. This category of cases benefits from the consideration of the issue on the existence of the following presumptions: presumption of moral (non-pecuniary) damage; presumption of illegality of actions (omission) of a causer of moral (non-pecuniary) damage; presumption of the guilt of a causer of moral (nonpecuniary) damage. According to the results of the conducted research, the authors have made conclusions.
Рассмотрены существующие доктринальные подходы к определению особенностей распределения обязанностей по доказыванию по делам о возмещении морального (неимущественного) ущерба в гражданском судопроизводстве Украины.
The authors of the article study the problem of distributing responsibilities on proving in cases of reimbursement for moral (non-pecuniary) damage. At the same time, it has been noted that each party is currently obliged to prove those circumstances, to which it refers to as the basis of its requirements and objections. Thus, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine of 2004 introduced a new concept of adversarial proceedings into civil procedure, where the parties are obliged to play an active role in judicial proving (Art. 12 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine). The authors of the paper have concluded that both the parties and all persons who are authorized to collect and present evidence, take part in their verification and evaluation in accordance with the procedure established by law are subjects in all civil cases, as well as in cases on reimbursement of moral (non -pecuniary) damage. Accordingly, it is also applied to the court, which should be actively involved in the proving process. The authors of the research have concluded that the process of proving provides the distribution of responsibilities between the subjects, when their will coincides with respect to the subject matter of the dispute. Another thing when such a will has different content. It is the specific feature of the adversarial principle, which is the basis for the distribution of responsibilities on proving, when the parties defend their interests presenting the necessary evidence in the case, pursuing the purpose – to obtain a positive judgment for themselves. It has been emphasized as a result of the research that legal presumptions play a significant role in the distribution of responsibilities on proving, that is, the assumptions enshrined in the law on the existence of certain facts about other facts related to them. The presumption releases the party, who benefits of its establishment, from proving the fact. Cases for the reimbursement of moral (non -pecuniary) damage are no exception to this. This category of cases benefits from the consideration of the issue on the existence of the following presumptions: presumption of moral (non-pecuniary) damage; presumption of illegality of actions (omission) of a causer of moral (non-pecuniary) damage; presumption of the guilt of a causer of moral (nonpecuniary) damage. According to the results of the conducted research, the authors have made conclusions.
Рассмотрены существующие доктринальные подходы к определению особенностей распределения обязанностей по доказыванию по делам о возмещении морального (неимущественного) ущерба в гражданском судопроизводстве Украины.
Опис
Кройтор, В. А. Розподіл обов’язків з доказування в справах про відшкодування моральної (немайнової) шкоди [Електронний ресурс] / Кройтор В. А., Сліпченко О. І. // Аналітично-порівняльне правознавство. - 2023. - № 1. - С. 171-179. - Режим доступу: http://app-journal.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/28.pdf.
Ключові слова
Цивільно-процесуальне право. Civil and Procedure Law. Гражданское процессуальное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, цивільне судочинство, civil justice, гражданское судопроизводство, відшкодування моральної (немайнової шкоди), compensation for moral (non-property) damage, возмещение морального (неимущественного вреда), докази, доказування, proving, доказывание, розподіл обов’язків по доказуванню, distribution of responsibilities for proof, распределение обязанностей по доказыванию, презумпція моральної (немайнової) шкоди, presumption of moral (non-property) damage, презумпция морального (неимущественного) ущерба, презумпція протиправності дій (бездіяльності) заподіювача моральної (немайнової) шкоди, презумпція наявності вини заподіювача моральної (немайнової) шкоди, презумція