Визначення та зміст поняття транспарентності кримінального судочинства
Вантажиться...
Дата
2022
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Право і безпека. – 2022. – № 3 (86). – С. 150-159
Анотація
Розглянуто загальноправові підходи до сучасного розуміння транспарентності у сфері державного управління та судочинства. Запропоновано авторське визначення транспарентності кримінального судочинства. Окреслено коло елементів, що входять до його змісту, яким також надано визначення. Такими елементами названо прозорість, відкритість, гласність, публічність, доступ до публічної інформації, підзвітність судової влади. Наголошено на особливостях транспарентності кримінального судочинства, у зв’язку з чим запропоновано низку законодавчих змін до Кримінального процесуального кодексу України.
Common law approaches to the modern understanding of transparency in the sphere of public administration and judiciary have been considered. On the basis of the models for the defini-tion of this concept and its content proposed in the specialized scientific literature, the author's definition of the transparency of criminal justice has been proposed. The circle of elements in-cluded in its content has been outlined, which have been also defined. Based on the provisions of the idea of judicial transparency in general, the definition has beenformulated and the main features of the concept of criminal justice transparency have beenoutlined. Transparency of criminal justice is a principle that includes such principles of criminal court activity as trans-parency, openness, publicity, publicity, access to public information, accountability.On the basis of the analysis of criminal procedural norms that reveal the content of the princi-ples of publicity and openness, suggestions have been made regarding: 1) increasingthe de-gree of legal certainty of the norms that regulate the procedure for consideration by the inves-tigating judge of a request for the conduct of secret investigative (search) actions; 2) it is necessary to take into account that the list of grounds provided for in Art. 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is not exhaustive, and/or to provide for the grounds indicated in this article, or to indicate that other cases provided for by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are possible. In this regard, it has been proposed to supplement Part 2 of Article 27 of the CPC of Ukraine with paragraph 6 as follows: “When the investigating judge considers the petitions of the investigator, agreed with the prosecutor, or the prosecutor to conduct covert inves tigative (search) actions, temporary access to things and documents (if there is a real threat of alteration or destruction of things or documents), as well as in case of need to ensure the seizure of property”; 3) the fact that the legislator, when setting out paragraph 1 of Part 2 of Article 27 of the CPC of Ukraine had not taken into account the fact that at the stage of pre-trial investigation the circumstances concerning the minor are also subject to consideration by the court, i.e. the investigating judge. Therefore, in such cases, one should talk about the expedien-cy of protecting the personal interests of the suspect, who is already a minor, and not the ac-cused. On the basis of the above, it has been proposed to set out paragraph 1, part 2 of Art. 27of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in the following version: “If the accused or suspect is a minor”.
Рассмотрены общеправовые подходы к пониманию транспарентности в сфере государственного управления и судопроизводства. Предложено авторское определение транспарентности уголовного судопроизводства. Обозначен круг элементов, входящих в его содержание, которым также дано определение. Такими элементами названы прозрачность, открытость, гласность, публичность, доступ к публичной информации, подотчетность судебной власти. Отмечены особенности транспарентности уголовного судопроизводства, в связи с чем предложен ряд законодательных изменений в Уголовный процессуальный кодекс Украины.
Common law approaches to the modern understanding of transparency in the sphere of public administration and judiciary have been considered. On the basis of the models for the defini-tion of this concept and its content proposed in the specialized scientific literature, the author's definition of the transparency of criminal justice has been proposed. The circle of elements in-cluded in its content has been outlined, which have been also defined. Based on the provisions of the idea of judicial transparency in general, the definition has beenformulated and the main features of the concept of criminal justice transparency have beenoutlined. Transparency of criminal justice is a principle that includes such principles of criminal court activity as trans-parency, openness, publicity, publicity, access to public information, accountability.On the basis of the analysis of criminal procedural norms that reveal the content of the princi-ples of publicity and openness, suggestions have been made regarding: 1) increasingthe de-gree of legal certainty of the norms that regulate the procedure for consideration by the inves-tigating judge of a request for the conduct of secret investigative (search) actions; 2) it is necessary to take into account that the list of grounds provided for in Art. 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, is not exhaustive, and/or to provide for the grounds indicated in this article, or to indicate that other cases provided for by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are possible. In this regard, it has been proposed to supplement Part 2 of Article 27 of the CPC of Ukraine with paragraph 6 as follows: “When the investigating judge considers the petitions of the investigator, agreed with the prosecutor, or the prosecutor to conduct covert inves tigative (search) actions, temporary access to things and documents (if there is a real threat of alteration or destruction of things or documents), as well as in case of need to ensure the seizure of property”; 3) the fact that the legislator, when setting out paragraph 1 of Part 2 of Article 27 of the CPC of Ukraine had not taken into account the fact that at the stage of pre-trial investigation the circumstances concerning the minor are also subject to consideration by the court, i.e. the investigating judge. Therefore, in such cases, one should talk about the expedien-cy of protecting the personal interests of the suspect, who is already a minor, and not the ac-cused. On the basis of the above, it has been proposed to set out paragraph 1, part 2 of Art. 27of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in the following version: “If the accused or suspect is a minor”.
Рассмотрены общеправовые подходы к пониманию транспарентности в сфере государственного управления и судопроизводства. Предложено авторское определение транспарентности уголовного судопроизводства. Обозначен круг элементов, входящих в его содержание, которым также дано определение. Такими элементами названы прозрачность, открытость, гласность, публичность, доступ к публичной информации, подотчетность судебной власти. Отмечены особенности транспарентности уголовного судопроизводства, в связи с чем предложен ряд законодательных изменений в Уголовный процессуальный кодекс Украины.
Опис
Гета, Д. С. Визначення та зміст поняття транспарентності кримінального судочинства / Дар’я Сергіївна Гета // Право і безпека. – 2022. – № 3 (86). – С. 150-159. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.3.13.
Гета Д. С. Визначення та зміст поняття транспарентності кримінального судочинства. Право і безпека. 2022. No 3 (86). С. 150–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.3.13.
Heta, D. S. (2022). Definition and content of the concept of transparency of criminal justice. Law and Safety, 3(86), 150–159.https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.3.13.
Гета Д. С. Визначення та зміст поняття транспарентності кримінального судочинства. Право і безпека. 2022. No 3 (86). С. 150–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.3.13.
Heta, D. S. (2022). Definition and content of the concept of transparency of criminal justice. Law and Safety, 3(86), 150–159.https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.3.13.
Ключові слова
Кримінально-процесуальне право. Criminal and Procedure Law. Уголовное процессуальное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, кримінальне судочинство, criminal justice, уголовное судопроизводство, транспарентність, transparency, транспарентность, прозорість, transparency, прозрачность, відкритість, openness, открытость, гласність, publicity, гласность, публічність, доступ до публічної інформації, access to public information, доступ к публичной информации, підзвітність судової влади, подотчетность судебной власти, accountability of the judiciary