Проблеми визначення предмета доказування в сучасному цивільному судочинстві України
Вантажиться...
Дата
2023
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Право і суспільство. - 2023. - № 1. - С. 68-76
Анотація
Досліджено актуальне питання визначення предмета доказування в сучасному цивільному судочинстві України. Зазначено, що в цивільному судочинстві слід виділяти загальний
предмет доказування по конкретній категорії цивільних справ та конкретний
предмет доказування залежно від обставин певної цивільної справи. А вже
встановлення конкретного предмета доказування залежить від обставин певної
цивільної справи, яка розглядається та вирішується в суді.
The scientific article is focused on studying the topical issue of determining the subject matter of proving in modern civil proceedings of Ukraine. The author of the article has proved that the analysis of the current civil procedural legislation of Ukraine, scientific conclusions about the content of the subject matter of proving in civil proceedings allows indicating that the conclusion on the need to distinguish between the concepts of “fact” and “circumstance” is quite logical, taking into account the fact that the first concept is assigned with the features of the greatest credibility and ability to cause legal consequences to court decisions that have entered into legal force. It has been defined that we can only talk about establishing the circumstances of the case within the course of a trial in civil proceedings. These two concepts are related as general and special. Accordingly, there is no need to mention the facts while naming the circumstances, because they are covered by the circumstances. Amendments to the relevant legal definition of the subject matter of proving in the new edition of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (Part 2 of the Art. 77 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (2017)) are verified and completely logical. Besides, it seems that Part 2 of the Art. 77 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine laid down a narrow approach to understanding the subject matter of proving that meets the needs of court practice to a greater extent. The author of the paper argues for the thesis that the subject matter of proving as the category of evidentiary law cannot be considered abstractly in relation to the whole civil judicial system. The scope of circumstances that must be proved in each type of civil proceedings, as well as in every category of civil cases, are fundamentally different. Thus, for example, the subject matter of proving in cases of some proceedings is determined by the purpose of the applicant’s appeal to the court to be protected. The author of the article has stated that the general subject matter of proving for a specific category of civil cases and a concrete subject matter of proving depending on circumstances of a particular civil case should be distinguished in civil proceedings. The establishment of a particular subject matter of proving depends on circumstances of a certain civil case, which is heard and settled in the court.
Исследован актуальный вопрос определения предмета доказывания в современном гражданском судопроизводстве Украины. Отмечено, что в гражданском судопроизводстве следует выделять общий предмет доказывания по конкретной категории гражданских дел и предмет доказывания в зависимости от обстоятельств определенного гражданского дела. А установление конкретного предмета доказывания зависит от обстоятельств определенного гражданского дела, которое рассматривается и решается в суде.
The scientific article is focused on studying the topical issue of determining the subject matter of proving in modern civil proceedings of Ukraine. The author of the article has proved that the analysis of the current civil procedural legislation of Ukraine, scientific conclusions about the content of the subject matter of proving in civil proceedings allows indicating that the conclusion on the need to distinguish between the concepts of “fact” and “circumstance” is quite logical, taking into account the fact that the first concept is assigned with the features of the greatest credibility and ability to cause legal consequences to court decisions that have entered into legal force. It has been defined that we can only talk about establishing the circumstances of the case within the course of a trial in civil proceedings. These two concepts are related as general and special. Accordingly, there is no need to mention the facts while naming the circumstances, because they are covered by the circumstances. Amendments to the relevant legal definition of the subject matter of proving in the new edition of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (Part 2 of the Art. 77 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (2017)) are verified and completely logical. Besides, it seems that Part 2 of the Art. 77 of the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine laid down a narrow approach to understanding the subject matter of proving that meets the needs of court practice to a greater extent. The author of the paper argues for the thesis that the subject matter of proving as the category of evidentiary law cannot be considered abstractly in relation to the whole civil judicial system. The scope of circumstances that must be proved in each type of civil proceedings, as well as in every category of civil cases, are fundamentally different. Thus, for example, the subject matter of proving in cases of some proceedings is determined by the purpose of the applicant’s appeal to the court to be protected. The author of the article has stated that the general subject matter of proving for a specific category of civil cases and a concrete subject matter of proving depending on circumstances of a particular civil case should be distinguished in civil proceedings. The establishment of a particular subject matter of proving depends on circumstances of a certain civil case, which is heard and settled in the court.
Исследован актуальный вопрос определения предмета доказывания в современном гражданском судопроизводстве Украины. Отмечено, что в гражданском судопроизводстве следует выделять общий предмет доказывания по конкретной категории гражданских дел и предмет доказывания в зависимости от обстоятельств определенного гражданского дела. А установление конкретного предмета доказывания зависит от обстоятельств определенного гражданского дела, которое рассматривается и решается в суде.
Опис
Кройтор, В. А. Проблеми визначення предмета доказування в сучасному цивільному судочинстві України / Кройтор В. А. // Право і суспільство. - 2023. - № 1. - С. 68-76. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2023.1.10.
Ключові слова
Цивільно-процесуальне право. Civil and Procedure Law. Гражданское процессуальное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, цивільне судочинство, civil justice, гражданское судопроизводство, цивільне процесуальне законодавство, civil procedural legislation, гражданское процессуальное законодательство, докази, доказування, proving, доказывание, предмет доказування, subject of proof, предмет доказывания, юридичний факт, legal fact, юридический факт, встановлення фактичних обставин справи, establishing the factual circumstances of the case, установление фактических обстоятельств дела