Окремі питання юрисдикційної форми захисту прав учасників господарських товариств
Дата
2016
ORCID
DOI
item.page.thesis.degree.name
item.page.thesis.degree.level
item.page.thesis.degree.discipline
item.page.thesis.degree.department
item.page.thesis.degree.grantor
item.page.thesis.degree.advisor
item.page.thesis.degree.committeeMember
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ. - 2016. - № 2 (73). - С. 136-143
Анотація
На основі аналізу норм чинного законодавства та правових позицій наукової спільноти досліджено форми захисту прав учасників господарських товариств. Зосереджено увагу на судовому захисті як на одній з юрисдикційних
форм захисту. Розглянуто поняття способів захисту прав учасників господарських товариств і можливість застосування не передбачених законодавством
способів, які можуть бути ефективними.
Based on the analysis of the current legislation and legal views of the scientific community the author has researched the forms of protection of the rights of business entities’ members. Special attention is focused on judicial protection as one of jurisdictional forms of protection. It is noted that for more effective implementation of the protection of civil rights there is a system (mechanism) of protection, which is the division of powers for protection according to forms and methods. There are several different opinions of scholars concerning the classification of the forms of protection, but the most common is the division into jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional forms. Jurisdictional method is divided into judicial order of protection and protection with the assistance of other state agencies, which is also called administrative. Non-jurisdictional form is presented by self-defense, protection via a notary and mediation. The most common form of jurisdictional protection of the rights of business entities’ members is judicial protection. It is implemented by the assistance of protection means of general rights under the Art. 16 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the Art. 20 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine and special rights prescribed by other law norms. Besides, controversial is still the issue on the possibility of using the ways of protection of the rights that are not regulated by the law, but that may be effective. Particular attention is paid to differentiation of the protection of the rights of business entities’ members into forms of jurisdictional protection and judicial protection by methods not provided by the law. Some views of the scientific community regarding these issues have been considered. In order to harmonize the legislation regulating legal relations of the protection of the rights of business entities’ members the author has suggested to amend the Art. 16 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the Art. 20 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine, securing the possibility to protect civil rights by other means, which are not prescribed by the law, but may be effective.
На основе анализа норм действующего законодательства и правовых позиций научного сообщества исследованы формы защиты прав участников хозяйственных обществ. Сосредоточено внимание на судебной защите как на одной из юрисдикционных форм защиты. Рассмотрено понятие способов защиты прав участников хозяйственных обществ и возможность применения не предусмотренных законодательством способов, но которые могут быть эффективными.
Based on the analysis of the current legislation and legal views of the scientific community the author has researched the forms of protection of the rights of business entities’ members. Special attention is focused on judicial protection as one of jurisdictional forms of protection. It is noted that for more effective implementation of the protection of civil rights there is a system (mechanism) of protection, which is the division of powers for protection according to forms and methods. There are several different opinions of scholars concerning the classification of the forms of protection, but the most common is the division into jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional forms. Jurisdictional method is divided into judicial order of protection and protection with the assistance of other state agencies, which is also called administrative. Non-jurisdictional form is presented by self-defense, protection via a notary and mediation. The most common form of jurisdictional protection of the rights of business entities’ members is judicial protection. It is implemented by the assistance of protection means of general rights under the Art. 16 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the Art. 20 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine and special rights prescribed by other law norms. Besides, controversial is still the issue on the possibility of using the ways of protection of the rights that are not regulated by the law, but that may be effective. Particular attention is paid to differentiation of the protection of the rights of business entities’ members into forms of jurisdictional protection and judicial protection by methods not provided by the law. Some views of the scientific community regarding these issues have been considered. In order to harmonize the legislation regulating legal relations of the protection of the rights of business entities’ members the author has suggested to amend the Art. 16 of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the Art. 20 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine, securing the possibility to protect civil rights by other means, which are not prescribed by the law, but may be effective.
На основе анализа норм действующего законодательства и правовых позиций научного сообщества исследованы формы защиты прав участников хозяйственных обществ. Сосредоточено внимание на судебной защите как на одной из юрисдикционных форм защиты. Рассмотрено понятие способов защиты прав участников хозяйственных обществ и возможность применения не предусмотренных законодательством способов, но которые могут быть эффективными.
Опис
Киричок А. В. Окремі питання юрисдикційної форми захисту прав учасників господарських товариств / А. В. Киричок // Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ. - 2016. - № 2. - С. 136-143.
Киричок А. В. "Окремі питання юрисдикційної форми захисту прав учасників господарських товариств." Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ 2 (2016): 136-143.
Kyrychok, A.V. (2016), “Some issues of jurisdictional form of protecting the rights of business entities’ members” [Okremi pytannia yurysdyktsiinoi formy zakhystu prav uchasnykiv hospodarskykh tovarystv], Visnyk Kharkivskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav, No. 2, pp. 136-143.
Киричок А. В. "Окремі питання юрисдикційної форми захисту прав учасників господарських товариств." Вісник Харківського національного університету внутрішніх справ 2 (2016): 136-143.
Kyrychok, A.V. (2016), “Some issues of jurisdictional form of protecting the rights of business entities’ members” [Okremi pytannia yurysdyktsiinoi formy zakhystu prav uchasnykiv hospodarskykh tovarystv], Visnyk Kharkivskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav, No. 2, pp. 136-143.
Ключові слова
Господарське право. Business Law. Хозяйственное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, юрисдикційна форма захисту, неюрисдикційна форма захисту, судовий захист, підсудність, способи захисту, учасники господарського товариства, jurisdictional form of protection, non-jurisdictional form of protection, judicial protection, jurisdiction, means of protection, господарські товариства, business entities’ members, хозяйственное общество, юрисдикционная форма защиты, неюрисдикционная форма защиты, судебная защита, подсудность, способы защиты