Протокол про адміністративне правопорушення та проблеми його складання

Abstract

Охарактеризовано зміст і форма протоколу про адміністративне правопорушення, проблеми його складання. Здійснено аналіз практики адміністративно-юрисдикційної діяльності органів внутрішніх справ, помилок, допущених при складанні зазначених протоколів. Сформульовано пропозиції щодо удосконалення чинного адміністративно-деліктного законодавства.Maintenance and form of protocol are characterized about an administrative crime, problems of his stowage. Marked, that one of the basic tasks of realization in matters about administrative crimes is providing correct norms of rights that envisage administrative responsibility. The decision of this task is carried out by establishment of actual circumstances of perfect misconduct. The most widely marked circumstances are represented in protocol about an administrative crime that must be made in accordance with the set requirements. Such accordance is checked up by the public servant of organ of administrative jurisdiction during preparation to the trial of business about an administrative crime. Current administratively-tort legislation did not define the order of actions in the cases when record and other materials of business about an administrative crime are made by the violation of the set requirements in relation to their registration. Research practices of activity of organs of administrative jurisdiction revealed that the public servants that authorized to take shipping very rarely send such materials to the person that carried out administrative investigation, for the removal of defects, although such cases and meet. With the aim of partial solution of this problem it was suggested to make changes in to a Code of Ukraine is about administrative crimes in relation to possibility of taking away of separate resolution (decisions) about direction of the improperly executed materials of business about an administrative crime to the subject of administrative investigation. The requirements in relation to the stowage of protocol are analyzed and separated into three basic groups: the first group of requirements touches establishment of circumstances of fact of feasance of administrative misconduct; the second is related to fixing different circumstances, that characterize a person who is attracted to administrative responsibility; the third group of requirements touches the form of protocol. Such type of the violations requirements in relation to registration of protocol was set on the basis of the studied materials of practice: superficial exposition of circumstances of offences; wrong establishment of face of offender, place of his work; absence of signatures and explanations of violators. Suggestions are formulated in relation to the improvement of the previous stage of administratively-tort realization that is: expansion of obligatory circumstances and information(essential elements) that must register in protocol about an administrative crime; obligatory registration of protocol in the organ of administrative jurisdiction, that carries out previous investigation of business, and handing of his copy to the person that is attracted to responsibility, and victim; an exception of possibility of registration of business materials is without drawing up a report about an administrative crime; determination of moment and judicial order of raising action about administrative misconduct and completion of her administrative investigation.Охарактеризованы содержание и форма протокола об административном правонарушении, проблемах его составления. Проведен анализ практики административно-юрисдикционной деятельности органов внутренних дел, ошибок, допущенных при составлении указанных протоколов. Сформулированы предложения по усовершенствованию действующего административно-деликтного законодательства.