Правова природа арешту майна у кримінальному процесі України
Вантажиться...
Дата
2018
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Прикарпатський юридичний вісник. - 2018. - Вип. 2 (23), т. 2. - С. 215-219
Анотація
Досліджено правову природу розвитку арешту майна у кримінальному процесі України. Наголошено, що визначення правової природи того чи іншого правового інституту дозволить найповніше розкрити сутність кожної процесуальної чи слідчої дії з метою недопущення дискримінації осіб та дотримання принципів кримінального процесу з урахуванням європейських стандартів.
The article investigates the legal nature of the development of property seizure in the criminal process of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the definition of the legal nature of a particular legal institute will allow to reveal the essence of each procedural or investigative action in order to prevent discrimination against persons and to observe the principles of criminal procedure in accordance with European standards. The latter are being actively implemented in the domestic practice of applying the criminal procedural law after the reform of the criminal justice system and the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is determined that measures for ensuring criminal proceedings are specific ways and means of limiting the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person, which are regulated by the criminal procedural law: 2) if the authority of the law and the conviction of the need to comply with the provisions of law are not enough; 3) in the presence of conditions, grounds and in the order established by the criminal procedural law; 4) for the termination or prevention of violations of the law by the participants of criminal proceedings specified in the law, in addition to their will and desire; 5) to ensure the effectiveness of criminal proceedings; 6) contrary to the will and will of the participants in criminal proceedings. It is established that the seizure of property is a measure of coercive nature, which, although limiting the property right of a person, ensures the effectiveness of the implementation of the principles of criminal proceedings and provides an opportunity to recover damages caused by a criminal offense. It was concluded that the institute was more and more subject to changes and numerous additions due to a number of factors, including: implementation of international legislation; taking into account the case law of the European Court of Human Rights; the inconsistency of certain provisions of the application of the Institute of property seizure in practical investigative and judicial practice.
Исследована правовая природа развития ареста имущества в уголовном процессе Украины. Отмечено, что определение правовой природы того или иного правового института позволит раскрыть сущность каждого процессуального или следственного действия с целью недопущения дискриминации лиц и соблюдения принципов уголовного процесса с учетом европейских стандартов.
The article investigates the legal nature of the development of property seizure in the criminal process of Ukraine. It is emphasized that the definition of the legal nature of a particular legal institute will allow to reveal the essence of each procedural or investigative action in order to prevent discrimination against persons and to observe the principles of criminal procedure in accordance with European standards. The latter are being actively implemented in the domestic practice of applying the criminal procedural law after the reform of the criminal justice system and the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is determined that measures for ensuring criminal proceedings are specific ways and means of limiting the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person, which are regulated by the criminal procedural law: 2) if the authority of the law and the conviction of the need to comply with the provisions of law are not enough; 3) in the presence of conditions, grounds and in the order established by the criminal procedural law; 4) for the termination or prevention of violations of the law by the participants of criminal proceedings specified in the law, in addition to their will and desire; 5) to ensure the effectiveness of criminal proceedings; 6) contrary to the will and will of the participants in criminal proceedings. It is established that the seizure of property is a measure of coercive nature, which, although limiting the property right of a person, ensures the effectiveness of the implementation of the principles of criminal proceedings and provides an opportunity to recover damages caused by a criminal offense. It was concluded that the institute was more and more subject to changes and numerous additions due to a number of factors, including: implementation of international legislation; taking into account the case law of the European Court of Human Rights; the inconsistency of certain provisions of the application of the Institute of property seizure in practical investigative and judicial practice.
Исследована правовая природа развития ареста имущества в уголовном процессе Украины. Отмечено, что определение правовой природы того или иного правового института позволит раскрыть сущность каждого процессуального или следственного действия с целью недопущения дискриминации лиц и соблюдения принципов уголовного процесса с учетом европейских стандартов.
Опис
Александрова, В. А. Правова природа арешту майна у кримінальному процесі України / В. А. Александрова // Прикарпатський юридичний вісник. - 2018. - Вип. 2 (23), т. 2. - С. 215-219.
Ключові слова
Кримінально-процесуальне право. Criminal and Procedure Law. Уголовное процессуальное право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, Україна. Ukraine. Украина, кримінальне провадження, criminal proceedings, уголовное производство, арешт майна, seizure of property, арест имущества, кримінальне судочинство, criminal justice, уголовное судопроизводство, правове регулювання, legal regulation, правовое регулирование, заходи забезпечення кримінального провадження