До характеристики судового засідання як центральної стадії оскарження адміністративних актів в адміністративному судочинстві

Abstract

Надано характеристику судовому засіданню як центральній стадії оскарження адміністративних актів в адміністративному судочинстві. Обґрунтовано, що на даній стадії оскарження вчиняються процесуальні дії, які мають зорієнтувати суд у справі і забезпечити ухвалення ним законного, обґрунтованого, неупередженого, справедливого рішення у ній.

The purpose of the article is to characterize the court session as the central stage of appealing against administrative acts in administrative proceedings. The article, based on the analysis of current legislation and scientific views of scientists, provides a description of the court session as the central stage of appealing administrative acts in administrative proceedings. It is substantiated that at this stage of the appeal procedural actions are taken, which should orient the court in the case and ensure its adoption of a lawful, reasonable, impartial, fair decision in it. It was found that at the stage of opening the proceedings the court (judge) performs procedural actions, which in their content are organizational in nature, ie aimed at verifying the availability and providing the minimum necessary conditions to begin clarifying the circumstances of the case there is evidence in it. In addition, at this stage, the court examines the reasons for the improper implementation of the parties to the proceedings of their procedural rights and responsibilities and determines the consequences of such behavior. It is concluded that the content of the court session as the main form of implementation of the stage of consideration on the merits of cases of appeals against administrative acts in administrative proceedings quite convincingly indicates that this stage is central in the administrative process. Because it is in the course of its implementation that the court and other participants in the case directly clarify and investigate its factual basis; exchange of arguments, arguments, remarks and proposals of the parties to the case regarding its investigated and already investigated facts and circumstances; formed and expressed by the parties and third parties and (or) their representatives final opinions on the subject matter of the dispute and its fair (in their opinion) solution. That is, at this stage, procedural actions are taken, which should guide the court in the case and ensure that it adopts a lawful, reasonable, impartial, fair decision in it.

Дана характеристика судебному заседанию как центральной стадии обжалования административных актов в административном судопроизводстве. Обосновано, что на данной стадии обжалования совершаются процессуальные действия, которые должны сориентировать суд по делу и обеспечить принятие законного, обоснованного, беспристрастного, справедливого решения в нем.