Proceedings in the cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards: problems and areas of improvement
Вантажиться...
Дата
2021
ORCID
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник
Члени комітету
Видавець
Підприємництво, господарство і право. – 2021. – № 12. – С. 23-28
Анотація
Метою статті є дослідження особливостей провадження у справах про надання дозволу на примусове виконання рішень арбітражу у цивільних справах та пошук шляхів удосконалення чинного цивільного процесуального законодавства.
Abstract. The purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of proceedings in cases of granting permission to enforce arbitration awards in civil cases and find ways to improve the current civil procedural legislation. Research methods. In the course of the research, both general scientific and special methods of cognition have been used. Results. The author has clarified the essence of the procedure for appealing to enforce arbitration awards in civil cases; elicited problems of the judicial procedure for granting permission to enforce arbitration awards; made proposals to optimize the current laws in legal relations under concern. Conclusions. The procedure for enforcing arbitration awards requires improvement. The legal issues that need to be settled within the current legislation include the resolution of the conflict between the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Courts of Arbitration” in terms of determining the competent court authorized to consider the case of the issuance of an executive document. This power should be assigned to the court of appeal, as it is currently enshrined in civil procedural law. In addition, the legal requirement for requesting the case from the arbitration court by the state court is unfounded, given the nature of proceedings in cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards. It is argued that legal grounds for a refusal to issue a writ of execution to enforce arbitration awards (arbitral panel, which made the arbitration award, did not meet statutory requirements; the arbitration award contains ways to assert the rights and protected interests not provided by law; the permanent arbitration tribunal did not provide the relevant case at the request of the court) should be excluded from art. 486 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine.
Целью статьи является исследование особенностей производства по делам о предоставлении разрешения на принудительное исполнение решений арбитража по гражданским делам и поиск путей усовершенствования действующего гражданского процессуального законодательства.
Abstract. The purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of proceedings in cases of granting permission to enforce arbitration awards in civil cases and find ways to improve the current civil procedural legislation. Research methods. In the course of the research, both general scientific and special methods of cognition have been used. Results. The author has clarified the essence of the procedure for appealing to enforce arbitration awards in civil cases; elicited problems of the judicial procedure for granting permission to enforce arbitration awards; made proposals to optimize the current laws in legal relations under concern. Conclusions. The procedure for enforcing arbitration awards requires improvement. The legal issues that need to be settled within the current legislation include the resolution of the conflict between the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Courts of Arbitration” in terms of determining the competent court authorized to consider the case of the issuance of an executive document. This power should be assigned to the court of appeal, as it is currently enshrined in civil procedural law. In addition, the legal requirement for requesting the case from the arbitration court by the state court is unfounded, given the nature of proceedings in cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards. It is argued that legal grounds for a refusal to issue a writ of execution to enforce arbitration awards (arbitral panel, which made the arbitration award, did not meet statutory requirements; the arbitration award contains ways to assert the rights and protected interests not provided by law; the permanent arbitration tribunal did not provide the relevant case at the request of the court) should be excluded from art. 486 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine.
Целью статьи является исследование особенностей производства по делам о предоставлении разрешения на принудительное исполнение решений арбитража по гражданским делам и поиск путей усовершенствования действующего гражданского процессуального законодательства.
Опис
Sapeiko, L. Proceedings in the cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards: problems and areas of improvement / Ludmyla Sapeiko // Підприємництво, господарство і право. – 2021. – № 12. – С. 23-28. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.12.04.
Sapeiko, Ludmyla (2021). Proceedings in the cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards: problems and areas of improvement. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 23–28, doi https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.12.04.
Sapeiko, Ludmyla (2021). Proceedings in the cases of granting permission for the enforcement of arbitration awards: problems and areas of improvement. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 23–28, doi https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.12.04.
Ключові слова
Цивільне право. Civil Law. Гражданское право, Держава і право. State and Law. Государство и право, Наукові публікації. Scientific publications. Научные публикации, arbitration award, executive document, powers of competent court, арбітражне рішення, виконавчий документ, повноваження суду, арбитражное решение, исполнительный документ, полномочия компетентного суда